Speaking of the Ladies.
Maybe it is just my business, maybe my generation, or maybe being the first born “son” to an athletic father, but I really get a bit chapped with the marketing of women’s golf. It seems to be nothing but fluff and appealing to a stereotype of us as little ladies with lily dipper swings wearing clothes perfectly coordinated in pink from our equipment to our clothes! Today I got my PGA trade magazine, devoted to helping women into the game... OK, good goal. But then Sports Illustrated had an online poll to vote for the “hot” ladies on tour. Jeez, I mean Sergio is pretty hot too; where do I cast my ballot for him? Is it really rocket science to figure us women out?
I have been watching women’s golf for years, and the coverage has always been sub par. They hire commentators that discuss family life and clothing (yawn!), bring out the second string camera crews, and make the tour look second rate. Why can’t they invest more into the Women’s Tour and make it exciting? In fact, why can’t the LPGA do more and create more excitement and buzz... I think the Big Break does a better job, although I have noticed that there is a lot of focus on the skirts in their camera replays.
I know marketing is about numbers and unfortunately, women represent only a small segment of our golfing population. In today’s tight economic times, reaching out to new customers is a high priority for courses and companies to maintain their bottom line. I would like to encourage them to remember that while women may have a tendency to accessorize, they still want the same things as men... A long drive down the fairway, approach shots that reach the green, and a few holed putts to brag about in the clubhouse.
By the way, who do you think is hotter, Sergio or Aaron Baddely?
-- Dee Forsberg


Recent Comments